Re: Ew! Harry Potter is Nasty. Two issues: Genetics and Anthropology. Genetics
Some traits are dominant, some are recessive. For example, brown eyes are dominant while blue eyes are recessive. Two brown-eyed parents, if they both have the recessive gene for blue eyes, have a 25% chance of producing a blue-eyed child. Personally, I have brown eyes and am a “carrier” of blue, while my spouse has blue eyes, which means that we have a 50% chance of having a blue-eyed child. Then comes the luck factor. Both of my children happen to have blue eyes. And no, we are not related as far back as anyone knows.
Two blue-eyed parents can not produce a brown eyed child. Also, if you live in a small, isolated community that has never seen a blue-eyed person, you can interbreed for thousands of years and never see blue eyes. Interbreeding doesn’t cause the recessive trait to exist. It just increases the odds that they will find each other.
Most hereditary conditions that are recessive work the same way. You need to have it on both sides to pass it on. You do not need to be related to pass it on, but it increases the chances.
(The exception to this is hereditary conditions that are attached to the sex chromosome, such as hemophelia. I can give you a lecture on that too, if you like. I got a million of ‘em.)
None of this, however, is relevant to the taboo. Anthropology
The incest taboo is defined differently by different cultures. The only truly universal taboo is between parent and child. And it’s not about genetics at all. It’s about holding the society together. What works and what doesn’t, depending on where you are.
One common custom was the REQUIRED Matralinial Cross-Cousin Marriage, popular in the days of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
But I gotta go. Enough lectures for now. |