The Werewolf

Ok, I get what you are saying now.

Two things bothered me the most about the werewolf firts it ahd no hair and second the arms were way longer than i pictured.

That's really interesting about the "scientific facts" about vampires. But facts concerning nature have little to do with the supernatural world. As an expert on all things werewolf, I can say that sizes range widely from demon to demon. Rage and hunger play a huge role in appearance... and age.

it is okay

would have been cooler if they showed something on the warewolf that linked him back to lupin like the same hair color or something ...people look diffrent so should warewolfs have something distinkied about each one !!

do you agree???

i expected the werewolf to be big and muscular not lanky

The werewolf was completely misrepresented. It is supposed to look very similar to a true wolf, small differences including the snout shape, the tufted tail, and the pupils of the eyes, as mentioned in OotP.
I just added it to the long list of things the movies got wrong.
They justified every Muggle and Wizarding prejudice against werewolves with that thing. That wasn't Moony at all.

The Werewolf was just plain creepy (eww) not at all how I visualized him in the book - where I saw a powerful creature that was scary, but not bald alien matter.

he was one funky werewolf

that was probally the point that you should not judge a book by its cover by making him not look like a regular wolf and it did have those differences but just a few more

That is the problem with movies sometimes the director and his stooges don't really know or share the vision of the books. They just hit all the highpoints and skip over much of what makes the books addictive and thrilling!