Doubts

Snape is innocent. Easy to hate but innocent.

I definitely think that Harry is an unintended horcrux or has one in him (confused is / has). There is evidence out there suggesting it. Evidence such as the almost identical resemblence as to how the diary (CoS) and the scar works - the diary being a horcrux. The way the scar hurts when it is activated as a medium. How Dumbledore had Harry study Occlumency to keep Vt out of his mind. Snape's not killing Harry (HBP) also may have been under the instructions of Vt suggesting that Voldemort MAY now know that Harry is a Horcrux. I still think Snape is innocent.

See my posts in "The Truth Behind The Scar" and "Harry as a Horcrux"

It may even be that Dumbledore had his own horcrux in his pheonix. Big doubt about that though.

Snape is innocent. Easy to hate but innocent.

I definitely think that Harry is an unintended horcrux or has one in him (confused is / has). There is evidence out there suggesting it. Evidence such as the almost identical resemblence as to how the diary (CoS) and the scar works - the diary being a horcrux. The way the scar hurts when it is activated as a medium. How Dumbledore had Harry study Occlumency to keep Vt out of his mind. Snape's not killing Harry (HBP) also may have been under the instructions of Vt suggesting that Voldemort MAY now know that Harry is a Horcrux. I still think Snape is innocent.

See my posts in "The Truth Behind The Scar" and "Harry as a Horcrux"

It may even be that Dumbledore had his own horcrux in his pheonix. Big doubt about that though.
[/b][/quote]

I still cant see it.. How can he be accidental when there is no way to make an accidental Horcrux? I just dont see a any possible ways that this could happen.. From what i read in Harry Potter and the HBP. i beleive that Horcurxes are very hard to make and take a lot of consentratioin and power.. I dont think Voldemort had the consentration that night to make one.

The idea of Harry as a horcrux seems more possible to me now for some reason. I still don't lean towards it the most, but it seems less unlikely to me now than it did before.

The scar's important. JKR's already said that "scar" is the word that Book VII ends with. I don't know if that's relevant to the issue.

But JK said that he was not there!

Not exactly.
Check her site, J.K.Rowling Official Site - Harry Potter and more, in the "Rumors" section.

Rumor: "Snape was hiding under the invisibility cloak on the night the Potters died."

JKR's answer: "No, he wasn't."

I don't believe Snape was there, but I don't see the above statement as proof-positive of anything.

Ok.. thats true.. He could of been there.. i just dont think he was..

If he was there, why was he there? To take a peek at how Voldemort finished off the Potters - a reward from the Dark Lord to him for obtaining the prophecy? I don't think so. If he was there, why would he have to be under the invisibility cloak any way? He was in cahoots with Voldemort then wasn't he? And if he was there with his master, why didn't he finish off Harry?

Did you think he would do finish off harry if he were there?
I don´t think he was under a invisible cloak or something. He was somewhere else, but not by the Potters.
That doesn´t result in a sense.

I'm not saying he was there.. just saying that he could of been.. We know if he was he was not under the invisibility cloak. Jk already said he was not.

Right.. Why didn't he kill Harry.. then and why did he not kill him all those years at Hogwarts? or when he had the chance 6th year when harry was running after snape?

So many questions so little time...