Isn't Daniel Radcliffe too Dramatic?

I still say he's perfect as Harry - and I can't wait for the release of the next film later this year!

i think he was in good in the 1st 4 movies but in OoP he was like........horrible!!!

in what way was he horrible?

Yeah he is too dramatic

well, he's a bit dramatic, but I think it was because they cut out quite a lot plot and Daniel Radcliffe had to express the angry or grumpy or sorrowful harry in a short time....

I think he is too dramatic, but also they've made harry into such a whiny character that I think he's partly just doing what he's been told to do.

I think he's following the books really well. Harry does get more dramatic with the progression of the Series. Especially when he explodes in OOP. I think in some parts he isn't dramatic enough. Maybe cause I'm a guy, I can relate to Harry and he is supposed to be very dramatic. Just think of all that he goes through on a day-to-day bases. It definitey is due to the emotional roller-coaster he goes through.

Well, he's still a young actor and the role is a dramatic one.
And I think part of is that the movies demand him to be somewhat overly dramatic in themselves.

I agree, Harry was supose to be freeked out. Come on put yourself in some of the situations that he was in and how would you react. Ok maybe some of his emotions needed some work, but in the beginning he was still new at portraying these emotions on screen. I think he did a great job and I couldn't imagine any one else being Harry Potter.