View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 08:06 AM
Psyduck's Avatar
Psyduck Psyduck is offline Scan Psyduck
Caretaker
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Rating: 9 Votes / 3.11 Average
Posts: 2,975
Default Re: Lexicon: JKR & WB vs. Steven Vander & Co.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gryffindor girl View Post
Yes....but surely he should have asked her permission before any announcement about publishing was made....
I don't know about the legal rights and wrongs - it's just good manners!!!!
True. But the right side doesn't always win.
You just reminded me of an old discussion and I had to go digging.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psyduck View Post
Barbie ® has found that she cannot sue people who make offensive parodies. The Barbie phenomenon has become so deeply a part of our common culture that it already is, in a way, in the public domain. The judge said that, "With Barbie, Mattel created not just a toy but a cultural icon," that "With fame often comes unwanted attention," that social commentary is protected by the U.S. constitution, and that "The parties are advised to chill." (BBC NEWS | Americas | Barbie loses battle over bimbo image)

How might the Barbie case law be relevant to Harry Potter? Has, or will, Harry become as much a part of our culture as Barbie?
I hope this new case doesn't go that way.
The point is just that it's not as simple as it seems. I wouldn't try to predict.
Reply With Quote

 
Old 04-18-2008, 08:06 AM
The Harry Potter LUMOS Book Light - the perfect gift for your little wizard. Special book 7 launch price: $10 off!