08-06-2007, 02:03 PM
|
 | Caretaker | | Join Date: Jul 2005
Rating:
Posts: 2,983
| |
 Re: The Scaly Flaky Baby
Quote:
Originally Posted by teddylupin  Damage- but not neccessarily a seperate shard. I think damage is healable and not definitively permanent unless you actually make a Horcrux, because then what seperates anyone who has killed from Voldemort? Because I do think there is quite a large difference. | Of course there's a big difference. But this ain't it. "By an act of evil -- the supreme act of evil. By committing murder. Killing rips the soul apart. The wizard intent upon creating a Horcrux would use the damage to his advantage: He would encase the torn portion..." This reminds me of our old argument. Harry Potter Chat > The Wizarding World > The Restricted Section of the Library > Year VII: Deathly Hallows
"Harry Has A Horacrux Too" Quote:
Originally Posted by Psyduck Interesting theory.
Unfortunately, you can't accidentially or unknowingly "murder" someone.
By legal and moral definition, "murder" includes intent. | Anyway, Slughorn was clear. The "torn portion" already exists when the wizard chooses to encase the torn portion.
Last edited by Psyduck : 08-06-2007 at 02:08 PM.
|