Quote:
Originally Posted by alohamora  Lol..you are one serious head case. Maybe I could refer you to a future shrink. I wonder who that would be. 
So what happend to 6/8's of the portion of voldy's soul that had already been destroyed? I mean did it alredy catch a train..to coin a phrase?
mcdirector can maybe help me out with my confused fractions. She's really good at math you know. 
I agree mostly with what you said. But this bit is confusing. Your saying that Dumbledore was not "ENTIRELY dead" because he owned the elder wand. But that deathly hallow did not give life ever lasting. Even if it did, lets say for arguments sake, that wand passed first into Draco's ownership because he disarmed Dumbledore, and then into Harry's ownership because Harry later disarmed Draco.
Well any way, I'm a total head case now. Maybe I need another free session lol. |
hahaha yeh im a nut job. i was tired when i wrote that, reading it now it doesnt really make sense, like it did in my head haha.
im not saying because of the wand he wouldn't be dead, i would just assume that if any one wizard can live forever - not physically speaking, then it would have been dumbeldore. i mean this in a spiritual sense.
the whole wizarding world is confusing, because basically all you need when someone dies is a portrait of them! dumbeldore is sitting in a spot on the wall at hogwarts - anytime someone wants a chat
i think thats awesome
i wish harry had portraits of his parents, sirius etc... could have made it interesting, but taken away the powerful parts including his parents.