Quote:
|
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Demelza @ Mar 14 2007, 06:58 AM) [snapback]31409[/snapback]
|
Quote:
|
It's very possible. After-all, if the theory put forward about Snape being there the night of the Potters' death is true its possible that he knew who the secret keeper was. [/b]
|
Quote:
|
Its not.. JKR stomped that idea down in her rumers section on her website. [/b]
|
Actually, it says:
Rumor:
"Snape was hiding under the invisibility cloak on the night the potters died."
JKR:
"No, he wasn't."
You'll notice that it doesn't actually mention Godric's Hollow. It's only about the cloak.
Ya gotta watch her. She's tricky.
I was never a fan of the Snape-was-in-Godric's-Hollow theory.
I see nothing in the books to support it. But this little slight-of-hand has me suspicious.
Quote:
|
...and remember at the end of the 6th book, when harry is chasing snape... one death eather gets harry from behind, but snape saves harry. shouting that they have to let potter for voldy. if he really was bad he would have killed harry there, he could have done. voldy would have been more than happy with that, even more happy than killing DD. but snape didnt do that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! why?? well, the answer is simple: becouse he is not on voly's side, but on harry's!! [/b]
|
This goes back to the Harry-is-an-accidental-Horcrux theory.
At first, Voldemort was trying to kill Harry.
Then Arthur was attacked by the snake, just before Christmas in the Order of the Phoenix.
Dumbledore said that, after Harry's vision of the attack on Arthur, Voldemort became aware of the mysterious connection created by the scar.
I say that this was the moment Voldemort became aware of the Horcrux, and changed his mind about killing Harry.
[/b][/quote]
well.. Thats true that JKR is tricky.. but like you said i dont think snape was there.. just nothing in the books to support that thoery.
and Harry as an Accidental Horcrux.. i just dont think there is enough evidence to support that either. see my post in "Harry as a Horcrux"